... then we will truly see how countries like Uruguay rank.
Yes – you are ‚The Real Deal’.
And your ranking will be great! The course of the motion of the molecules (→‘Brownian
motion’) will have to be reconsidered. Very helpful will be the fantastic
quality of the underlying database … Ranking 2014 (federtopfoot): Brazil
7. Great! That’s exactly what happened in 2014 …
And the consequences of your proposals would be that Portugal would never again play against France, but
against any French region. Why should they do this? – if they could (after
10 defeats in a row) beat France
and could become European Champion!
are just playing Salieri to your Mozart...
Topic here is ‘Historic Rankings’. Although
we should make a difference between the ‘historic’ Salieri, who was very
different to the ‘movie version’…: for the purpose of fun let’s occur for a
moment Milos Forman’s evil Salieri:
He thrashes all who stands for Mozart. ‘Abram’, you are the first one …!
sarcasm and second language go terribly together. but if i am translating your france portugal argument properly, the answer is simple (which you practically answered yourself). portugal's 10 losses against france are not an appropriate result in regards to the ratio of performance and resources.
your brazil germany argument is also poor (again, if i am understanding you properly). cherry picking 1 example to attempt to prove a statistical analysis wrong is a rudimentary mathematical mistake. see the law of large numbers
so i assume since you are so against my ideas that a united europe vs cape verde game in football would be an excellent match such as a match between croatia and serbia, and a basketball game featuring the united states vs united states virgin islands will certainly tell us a lot about who is better (this is sarcasm by the way).